Quoiaesthetic refers to a specific orientation that involves uncertainty about attraction. Individuals who identify with this orientation often feel confused about their feelings and may struggle to define what attraction means to them. This term encompasses a spectrum of experiences where someone may not fully understand their feelings or whether they experience attraction at all.
The prefix “quoi-” comes from the French word meaning “what,” and it encapsulates the essence of questioning one’s feelings. People who identify as quoiaesthetic may find themselves questioning their emotional responses and the nature of their attractions. This orientation highlights the complexity of human emotions and the importance of recognizing that not everyone experiences attraction in the same way.
The concept of quoiaesthetic emerged alongside other related terms like quoisexual and quoiromantic. These terms began to gain traction around 2014 when discussions on platforms like Tumblr brought attention to the nuances of attraction and identity. Quoiaesthetic serves as a reminder that understanding one’s feelings can be a challenging journey, and it allows individuals to express their unique experiences in a supportive context.
Jordan often found themselves questioning their feelings about attraction. They would watch friends develop crushes or feel butterflies in their stomachs, yet Jordan felt nothing or only a vague sense of confusion. Whenever someone asked about their feelings, Jordan would shrug and say, “I don’t know,” which left them feeling even more isolated.
As time passed, Jordan started to explore the concept of quoiaesthetic. They discovered a community where others shared similar experiences, and for the first time, Jordan felt understood. With each conversation, they began to embrace their uncertainty, realizing that it was okay not to have all the answers about attraction.
Why do you keep falling for the same type?
Read the article Lovemaps: the hidden blueprint of our love.
Did you not find what you were looking for? Let me help you find more.
